PG.Net Ambassador
Posts: 4619
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Long ago, in a land far, far away...

Mystery Angel
~
PLEASE BE WARNED- major spoilers from the stage show will be shown here, and since they are out in the public, I’m posting it freely. I won’t be putting the spoiler tags on since I’m interweaving it with things I want to mention … so if you haven’t seen the show and want to be surprised, do NOT read further …
When ALW first mentioned he would do the sequel and told a bit about it, I said then that LND wasn’t a sequel to the movie or the Hidden Plot. I still have that opinion.

For one thing, the movie had Christine die in her sixties. For another, it showed Raoul as a Vicomte throughout all of movie, including the auction, while Christine had become a Countess. IF she had married Raoul, she would have taken on HIS title for a name, in the feminine form- Vicomtesse (or Viscountess if they were keeping it to the English and not the French). A woman of Christine’s background took on the man’s title in those days. No exceptions.
Neither of the above happened in the LND stage show. And there were a few other differences in the movie as well. The stage show was truly “stand alone.” It’s like this—someone decides to write two phanphics (and ANYTHING other than the original Gaston Leroux could be called a phanphic—even if it’s written by a professional.) I’ve written 5 phanphics and am writing others (though in NO way do I compare myself to ALW and his genius!)- but the point is—though they’re all E/C pairing with only Erik & Christine being the true loves and they all originate from the same classic story—they each have different plots regarding what could have happened either during movie or after or both.
I believe that’s what ALW did with the PotO stage show, the LND stage show, and the movie—he wrote 2 (or 3) different phanphic ideas – of the SAME pairing. Erik and Christine.
So, how are LND and the movie/hidden plot alike? Both are all about E/C and their love that was strong, passionate, eternal - and never died. With a bond between them so strong, nothing could break it. Not time, not events, not other people ... nothing.
With Love Never Dies, ALW has now come right out and blatantly shown that he prefers E/C – he clearly wrote it that way. Before, in other mediums such as the movie, fans would speculate and argue that we E/Cers were just seeing what we wanted to see. Things were often too unclear (the ending), too hazy, and “hidden” (i.e.- Hidden Plot). Phantasia CD also was all about E/C love, put out by ALW, but “canon” fans would say—"it was just about the music, only the music. That’s all that E/C had together." "She felt sorry for him, pitied him," and who knows how many other reasons we heard for her kiss to him, etc. Never mind how with using the sets and costumes and music and body language and so much more they showed the E/C kiss as much more passionate, fulfilling, love-filled, and romantic than the R/C one, which seemed sweet but almost childish — still everyone “canon” and R/C said we were wrong.
Well, now ALW has SHOWN, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that no, the music wasn’t the only bond holding Erik and Christine together. And no, she wasn’t under his spell either. They had a love- a love that NEVER died. Meaning — it was always there.
I've said before that maybe one reason ALW (and JS) created the hidden plot/deeper story through the symbolism used, etc, was because they were worried and nervous about how the phans might react. And after more than a decade in the entertainment industry myself (my day job) no one can tell me that all we found didn’t mean something, (differing views about some of the ideas for the symbolism, sure)—but in the movie, it all boils down to Erik & Christine as soul mates, lovers, and eventually coming together. That she saved him just as much as he saved her. (The Hidden Plot points to marriage.)
ALW made LND into an opera, which has to end tragically as all operas do. That is what an opera is — a tragic romance story told through singing. So, before they could marry, tragedy struck. But the intent was there — they WOULD marry and spend a lifetime together. Christine had made her choice, to leave Raoul, choosing to sing Love Never Dies to show that she loves and always has loved Erik, and Raoul, knowing he’d lost, surrendered and walked away.
But back to what I said before — remember when ALW first had the idea for Love Never Dies? He wasn’t certain he should do it, he held back. But his friends encouraged him to go for it. My feeling is he held back because he knew there would be a lot of angry R/C and “canon” phans especially, and it could hurt his revenue. I even said at the time of the hidden plot unraveling that might be why he made a “hidden plot” in movie and didn’t come out with an ending that CLEARLY showed E/C but instead was hazy and confusing, only being able to find an "E/C everlasting love" idea through symbolism, clues, etc.
In looking at the reviews for the show, I see that many phans are upset about the whole E/C idea, just as I suspected might happen. Is it any wonder he hid the E/C truth of “love and forever” within the movie? I think though, it wasn’t enough for him — to subtly show it in a way it was almost hidden — and he decided the time had come to boldly show what he meant all along. To at last have a show where Christine stated her love, showed it in backstory and present story, and showed them as the couple always meant to be.
Yes, I still feel the stage show and the movie are different — LND is not a sequel to the movie. But it WAS yet another way to show what ALW has always meant with the PotO stage show, with the 2004 movie, with the Phantasia CD, with the companion book (including the original screenplay of JS, who has also shown an E/C preference in many ways). And now, finally in big black bold letters, on stage, in song, in every way conceivable —with Love Never Dies— ALW has clearly shown it was always about Erik and Christine and their love. And they were the ones that he meant to end up together.
If he does do a Love Never Dies “sequel” for the movie (I don’t see how he can really) but if he does, he’ll have to change that last scene for sure, because Christine didn’t die in her 20s, as it shows in LND. The only other way he could do it is just to say — okay, here’s another movie, with the PotO idea — but it’s standalone (like he did with the stage show) — a continuing idea to the PotO theme of the original, but NOT a sequel to the 2004 movie.
Regarding some questions recently asked of me since LND’s premiere, first, here are two snippets of what someone said who saw the show (I fixed some grammar, spelling, etc, to make it easier to read):
Q: Do they ever explain the whole Christine/Phantom one night stand/ conceiving Gustave thing?
A: yea they do explain that Christine goes to the phantom before her wedding day and they sleep together, and then the phantom leaves her as morning approaches because he is soooooo shamed at what he had done and thinks that she'll be repulsed by him.
From Honey- Just because this person said she goes to him “before her wedding day”- I don’t take that to mean that she had still planned to marry Raoul, if she'd ever planned to. The above is only how one theater goer put it, in her words.
It doesn’t fit for what they've shown of Christine’s character to do that … to go hunt Erik down and get a quickie with him while planning to marry another man. Also, then it makes no sense of why Erik would feel the need to leave the country — if she just came to him for that one night and would never see him again.
I think the idea of the backstory of LND was that Christine DID make her choice (ordered of her at end of PotO lair scene). SHE went to Erik — she went looking for him, found him, and the passion that had been building between them throughout all of PotO found an explosive outlet. In short, they gave into their feelings for one another, probably not planning to, but unable to keep from doing so. They made love.
BUT- they still show Erik as an honorable man — because he came to be ashamed of what he’d done. Everyone makes mistakes, and he felt he’d made one in taking Christine to his bed. But that’s not all of what made him leave — he was sure that not only would she regret that they’d made love before marriage (and that he’d taken her virginity away — a MAJOR thing in those days) — but he felt that now that the passion had ebbed, in the clear, stark light of morning she would be repulsed that she had made love to a monster, how he saw himself. Perhaps he even felt he had pushed her into it (wrongly, as she later tells him by saying she loved him). He’s struggled over 30 years with his face and all the abuse and rejection that came from it. One extremely passionate kiss, later followed by a night of lovemaking with the woman he adores is not going to suddenly change his views about himself. Something like that would take a great deal of time … and perhaps he would never be able to completely let go of the pain and accept himself.
So, upset with himself and worried that she’ll now despise him (for more than one reason), he leaves her as morning approaches — which sounds as if he left the bed before she woke up.
So, now picture Christine. She made her choice and in so doing, she, a virgin, gave herself to the man she loves — engaging in an act that was then considered scandalous before marriage — only to wake up and find him gone. And knowing Erik, this time he ran away to where she couldn’t find him. We know he ran away — to Coney Island. She probably felt hurt, abandoned, and betrayed — and then very scared when she discovered she was pregnant. She turned to her childhood friend — whether she told him the baby was Erik’s or not, I don’t know — but I’m pretty sure he knew about the baby’s identity all through LND. (Please correct me if I’m wrong about that.) Raoul, as he’d always done in playing “white knight” – saved the woman he loved by marrying her — but he became very bitter, a drunk, and a gambler. Why would he become that and sink so low if he had at some point won Christine’s love???
Because he knew he never had and never would. (“Say you love him and my life is over”)
He knew her heart would always belong to Erik, and the only reason she married Raoul was to give a name for her child, needing someone to take care of them. I don’t doubt that in her own way, Christine did love Raoul. As a friend. As someone to protect her and Gustave (her and Erik's son). But never, NEVER as strongly and deeply as she loved Erik. HE left HER (because of some wrong ideas and a whole lot of guilt)—and if she could have found him when he first left and convinced him to stay with her, I believe she would have. Maybe she even tried. Why do I think this? Because of this…
Q: In the show do Christine and the Phantom share any sort of romance?
A: when the Phantom and Christine are together they have loads of chemistry, and also during the song beneath a moonless sky there is sooooooooo much passion between the characters, during this song Christine also tells the phantom that she loved him. But I guess she tells him when she is performing the title song. During “Devil Take the Hindmost” Raoul and the Phantom have a bet that if Christine sang she would stay with the Phantom and if she didn’t she would leave with Raoul and their debt would be repaid. So Christine decides during the title song.
From Honey: Erik sent for Christine, to work for him—he had to see her again, to hear her voice (“‘Til I Hear You Sing” shows that). He felt empty and needed her near. After a decade of not seeing him, not knowing he was her new employer, the very moment they see each other, the sparks are there and within a short time Christine tells Erik she loved HIM. He learns Gustave is his son. Throughout the show, whenever she and Erik are together, it’s obvious that their love NEVER DIED. And they have a son together, which is even more of a bond they share.
From what I understand, that song was a way of telling Erik she still loves him. If she sings it, she admits her love is still there (and hurts Raoul who’s been her friend — she tries to be a “dutiful” wife throughout — the conflict in this, her not wanting to hurt Raoul more than she has) — and if she sings it, she will stay with Erik and become his wife. If she doesn’t sing it, Erik will leave them alone, pay all their debts, and they will never see him again.
Raoul tries to convince her not to sing. I’m not sure if he tells her all the details of the bet. But in the end, she cannot betray her heart and her need to be with Erik …
There are a few things I don’t like about LND, sure — one of the main ones being that Christine dies tragically in the end — when the gun accidentally goes off, due to a jealous Meg who’s also fallen in love with Erik, and first turned the gun on him, then herself. He talked her out of killing them both, but then made the mistake of calling her Christine (his mind and heart full of the woman who’d just proven her love to him, no doubt.) In the end, Erik finds the love and acceptance he's always craved--first through Christine, then through their son.
I once said I’d never see it, because I thought it would be based on POM, which totally went against all character. (And also I heard that Erik would “make love” to a Christine mannequin).
LND did have a bit of the same concept of POM at the end, but the characters remained true to life in how I believe they could have evolved, knowing PotO story — and he didn’t feel up a mannequin. lol
And so, I’ve changed my mind.
One day, I hope to be able to go and see it.
These are my views. If anyone has any questions or comments or wants to add, please feel free to speak up. I'm only basing this on what I’ve read about the show through reviews people have sent me, both professional and amateur. In light of that, please remember I don’t have all the answers — except to say:
LND was clearly all about E/C, and so was the movie (with a plot no longer hidden).
Long live Erine!

And two hearts were entwined for all eternity
*Thanks nightsmusic for avatar! *E/C Banner/manip made by me (from The Treasure)
*More full E/C manip/paintings in my album
~ *Captain of the Hidden Plotters ...Is there a "Hidden Plot" in 2004 POTO movie? You decide!
The Hidden Plot (HP)
E/C Phanphics (more to come soon) THE QUEST (HP-bk.1)
THE TREASURE (HP-bk. 2 - adult)
REFLECTIONS of the SOUL
A PHANTOM CHRISTMAS CAROL
SYMPHONY in the TWILIGHT - adult -click links to read

Godzuki foresees a road trip to NYC to see LND in the future?
